+Jiri in To Dave Stux wrote on Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 09:39:23PM -0000: > I have opened bugs relating to bcc, and I see no reply on them. > Currently, at least in my testing, the state of ,pst pf the bcc dependent tools in F35 is broken. > Examples: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127642 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057139 bcc 0.22 is quite old and I think you have it right in this bug: just updating to a newer bcc version would likely fix all these issues. fedora 37+ have bcc 0.24 which is more reasonable and probably works, so I guess it'd just be a matter of pushing it for f35/36 as well. (note there's a bcc 0.25 that might be good for rawhide, but it breaks API on bcc_prog_load_xattr() breaking e.g. older gobpf or bpftrace, see https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/issues/2340 , so that one should not be backported -- but I'm not aware of any such problem for bcc 0.22 to 0.24) > I have filled non-responsive bug, but there's no reply on it too: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136222 > > Can anyone contact Jiri Olsa or update if he is out on vacation? > Is there an additional package maintainer? -- Dominique _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
