Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have not used nodejs for development in quite a while so cannot
respond from an involved user perspective. Given that context, I
concur with Dan's reasoning and choices.

On a more meta note, Fedora has at least 3 mechanisms to provide
multiple versions of some component for a given release -
alternatives, modules, and versioned packages (ala nodejs, haskell,
etc). What is the best place to document this for a target user
community (e.g. nodejs users and developers)? We are looking at
adopting alternative versions for plain kubernetes in Fedora.

Best regards

Brad

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:45 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>

> >
> > +1. It also sounds like this option is easiest on the maintainers.
>
> I agree. I think there's at least general consensus around the idea
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux