Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As I'm implementing this, I'm realizing that it probably only makes
sense to have the default version of Node.js on each Fedora release
provide the unversioned-command. Otherwise it becomes really hard to
ensure that the RPM macros like %{nodejs_sitelib} refer to the correct
location. So I think I'll stick with "if you're packaging for Fedora,
it has to work on the default Node release *or* you must deal with
everything yourself if you need to run on a different runtime".

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:38 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging
> with the results of this discussion. I'll go the
> `nodejs-$MAJOR-unversioned-command` route.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux