Re: F38 proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 2/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
> installed 
> as Fedora 24, now running 36. For some rpm and dnf operations, I get
> the 
> following kind of errors:
> 
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     740
> Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID d651ff2e: BAD
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> 
> I first noticed this with 'dnf upgrade', simplified to 'dnf reinstall
> glibc', perhaps the best reproduces is 'rpm -qa > /dev/null'.
> 
> Regardless of these errors, all the commands work as expected. Still
> I 
> wonder, is it expected that old installations will see, and keep
> seeing, 
> these errors after distrusting SHA-1?

That is the RPM Fusion signing key. 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux