On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership > > would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some > > groups or pseudo-users, but in turn, that meant there is nobody who > > would care about such package. > > +100 While that can surely happen, it can and does also happen when someone is 'main admin' of a package. :) You can't make someone care. I think the best thing we can do is match up the people who care with the packages they care about. Using main admin as a indicator of who cares for the package doesn't seem right to me. You can definitely have cases of packages where multiple people work on it, or cases where just one person does, but they aren't the main admin. Anyhow, the only real reason we need main admin is that bugzilla needs 1 specific user to assign bugs to. Perhaps we could consider this when/if we ever move off bugzilla. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
