Re: Users with commit rights in src.fp.o but no more in packager group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 03. 09. 22 v 22:28 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 02:01:59PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 26/08/22 07:17, David Tardon ha scritto:
Hi,

On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On to, 25 elo 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We use the python-maint pseudo-account to be the default Bugzilla
assignee for Pythons, e.g.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.11

Note that it does *not* require the account to be listed in
maintainers or to have commit rights.
Same for ipa-maint account.
Same for systemd-maint and dracut-maint.

D.
So... wouldn't be better to have a consistent way across all packages to
deal with these cases?
Sure, but Fedora has been around for many years, accross a bunch of
differnt applications and these things have never been completly set.
:(

What's better, a pseudo-user to be the main-admin of a package, or a
real user to be the main-admin and just add the pseudo-user as the
default assignee of bugs?


What is the difference between pseudo-users and groups? The group membership management is certainly PITA, because group members cannot e.g. remove the group from retired packages:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10954

Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some groups or pseudo-users, but in turn, that meant there is nobody who would care about such package.


Vít


We discussed this back when we switched from pkgdb to pagure-dist-git
some. One thought at the time was that we make every package use a
pseutouser for main-admin, but there's downsides to that too.
On the plus side it would allow us to get rid of 'main admin'.
Who owns the credentials of those pseudo-users? Also, Fedora Accounts
user pages links to non-existent wiki pages... it would be nice to have
a description about them (if there's a consensus of continue listing
them as main-admin).
Many of them the group using them has the credentials, or no one at all.

I'm not sure it's possible to get them all sorted, but I agree at least
a wiki page with info on them would be good to have at the very least.

kevin

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux