On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:48 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 31. 08. 22 13:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hello license folks. > >> > >> I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX: > >> > >> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause > >> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU > >> > >> Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so > >> rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right? > >> > > > > rpmlint only knows what licenses we tell it, and the Fedora rpmlint > > policy has not been updated yet because we want the > > fedora-license-data package to produce the necessary TOML file that > > rpmlint will source rather than me maintaining another copy of this. > > > > rpmlint will handle both Fedora style and SPDX license tags once we > > have that data file in place. > > Great. Is this the file? > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/rawhide/f/licenses.toml > > What's needed? Move this file to licenses-legacy.toml and install licenses.toml > from fedora-license-data? I can do that. > Ideally, both files would come from there instead, since they will maintain the list of allowed licenses there. I filed an issue for it: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/65 -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
