On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello license folks. > > I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX: > > python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause > python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU > > Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so > rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right? > rpmlint only knows what licenses we tell it, and the Fedora rpmlint policy has not been updated yet because we want the fedora-license-data package to produce the necessary TOML file that rpmlint will source rather than me maintaining another copy of this. rpmlint will handle both Fedora style and SPDX license tags once we have that data file in place. -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
