On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH] > > Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses" > > So what is > https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf > https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html > https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash > then? I'm sorry, which point were you trying to prove with these links? -> https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf This is a ~50 page document, of which one page refers to DT_GNU_HASH, and only contains a short description of how to use it. - https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html This is a mailing list post by you, and you wrote: """but for the final specification I'm afraid you need to read binutils and/or libc sources.""" - https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash This looks like a reverse-engineering effort of the binary DT_GNU_HASH format based on the source code - it starts with: """The problem with it is that DT_GNU_HASH is not documented anywhere other than in GNU binutils and glibc source code.""" Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
