Hi, On Friday, 19 August, 2022, 03:05:03 am IST, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive >Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive >have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after >the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed >from the packager group. > >For the curious, here are the stats from today's run: > >2550 users checked >913 of those had no activity on src.fedoraproject.org or pagure.io >835 of those had no activity in Bodhi >812 of those had no activity on the mailing lists >606 of those (~24% of packagers) had no activity in Bugzilla. > * Interesting numbers there. * While I get that such pruning from time to time is generally good. What happens to the packages orphaned by removing inactive packagers? * Removing orphaned packages may not be easy, as other packages may depend on them. Thank you. --- -P J P http://feedmug.com _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
