Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Unfortunately, this state of affairs has ended. Libusb, one of
> novacom's dependencies has been retired, and it's not clear to me that
> it's worthwhile (or even possible) to keep novacom alive.
Does this not build against libusb-compat-0.1-devel? (That has been the
replacement for the old libusb-devel 0.1 for ages, and it is still in
Fedora.)
Unless this actually wants libusb 1 (some versions also known as libusbx),
then it should BuildRequire libusb1-devel instead.
That said, I am NOT interested in picking up this package, just pointing out
how whoever wants to maintain it can probably fix it.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
