On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 3:23 PM Leigh Scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 10:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > As the maintainer of rpmdevtools, I will probably not accept changes > > upstream to change to rpmautospec in the templates, since rpmautospec > > doesn't work outside of Fedora and there's been no advocacy to make > > rpmautospec a cross-distro tool. If someone wants to champion > > rpmautospec as a cross-distro tool, then I will reconsider. > > > I'm -1 if it means I can't use rpmdevtools with the old behaviour. I'm not sure what you mean here? Which program that is provided by rpmdevtools do you think will be broken? At least spectool and rpmdev-bumpspec support spec files that use rpmautospec. And I'm pretty sure the rest will just continue working (because the only one that reads / writes to "Release" and "%changelog" is rpmdev-bumpspec, which supports both "normal" packages and packages that use rpmautospec). Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
