On 06. 08. 22 16:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Let's make %autorelease + %autochangelog the default approach in Fedora packaging
I still haven't got around to start using it, because I recall that initially there were problems I've reported or followed and nobody was looking into them. This got a bit better, but is still quite bad :(
How can we ensure a permanent maintainer has dedicated time to keep the tool evolving, before we start recommending it?
The following issues all bother me and nobody seem to have the resources to fix them or even look at them:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/105 -- 2 years ago https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/193 -- 1 year ago https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/206 -- 1 year ago https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/209 -- 1 year ago https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/227 -- 1 year ago https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/issue/238 -- 9 months ago -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
