Re: Minizip renaming Fedora Change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:19 AM Lukas Javorsky <ljavorsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Also, the idea is to file Bugs for all packages that BuildRequire/Require the minizip package and let them know about this change and if they should change theirs requirements.

Just an idea: You could even make the switch from minizip ->
minizip-ng a (partially) backwards-compatible change, by adding some
virtual provides (something like: add "Provides: minizip-ng" to
minizip, and "Provides: minizip-ng-devel" to minizip-devel), maybe
even in all current Fedora branches. That way, packages could start to
migrate, without needing conditionals in spec files for different
Fedora branches, and they'd be seamlessly switched over from minizip
to minizip-ng once the package is renamed.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux