ah, true, different sonames solves this :)
On 28.07.22 10:52, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:44:14AM +0200, Marcus Müller wrote:
The latter change seems unwise. Packages which now depend on minizip (to be
minizip-ng) will continue to do depend on whatever Provides(minizip); if you
rename the zlib subpackage to minizip, they will depend on the wrong thing.
Both these packages merely provide an ELF library. As such anything that
depends on them should have automatically gained a Requires against the
SONAME of the contained library - 'libminizip.so.3.0()(64bit)' (for minizip)
vs 'libminizip.so.1()(64bit)' (for minizip-compat).
As such it shouldn't matter what the actual package name is, any dep will
continue to resolve to the correct renamed package at install time.
The only significant impact of the rename should be on BuildRequires
which could end up pulling in the wrong version, but presumably if
the API is different that ought to resolve in a koji build failure
which is easy enough to identify and fix the BuildRequires.
With regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
