Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Given the overlap of the Fedora/RH boot loader folks and the shim > folks, I think there's definitely an avenue to get systemd-boot signed > as payload for SHIM, as alternative to Grub. If Fedora wants this, and > has the man power for it, it should be a quite a reachable goal, given > that sd-boot has only a tiny fraction of the code footprint that Grub has. So, I went to look a little more at systemd-boot/sd-boot... and noticed the packaging is really odd in Fedora. Why is it shoved into the systemd-udev RPM? It seems that systemd-boot should be its own subpackage. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
