Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Given the overlap of the Fedora/RH boot loader folks and the shim
> folks, I think there's definitely an avenue to get systemd-boot signed
> as payload for SHIM, as alternative to Grub. If Fedora wants this, and
> has the man power for it, it should be a quite a reachable goal, given
> that sd-boot has only a tiny fraction of the code footprint that Grub has.

So, I went to look a little more at systemd-boot/sd-boot... and noticed
the packaging is really odd in Fedora.  Why is it shoved into the
systemd-udev RPM?  It seems that systemd-boot should be its own
subpackage.
-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux