BitLocker (was Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> This is a good point to underscore. The user experience following a Fedora installation when Bitlocker is enabled, is the appearance of Windows being broken or inaccessible. We are probably better off asking Anaconda to refuse to install when Bitlocker is detected. Or at least a warning dialog.

This brings up something I've wondered about... I have a Thinkpad T14
(gen 2a) bought earlier this year.  I shrunk the pre-installed Windows
within Windows before installing Fedora 35.  I have no real need to
access it from Linux (only reason I didn't delete Windows is it's a work
computer).

I did poke at it though, and trying to mount it (with no FS type
specified) returns "unknown filesystem type 'BitLocker'.".  When I boot
into Windows, it still works fine (no issue booting).  I tried to get a
recovery key, but Windows says it's not encrypted.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux