On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:08 AM Marián Konček <mkoncek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I used a wrong mailing list, I meant to send it here. > > I still see this approach as wrong. You can change the archfulness of > the main package. You can add a -java subpackage which is noarch and > provides the main package name for example. In the .spec I see you > manually invoke expanded %mvn_install macro. > "antlr4-project" is what "antlr4" should be in my opinion. If you want to blame somebody for this, then blame me. It was my suggestion to do it this way during package review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795470#c2 However, I still think it was the right decision to do it this way. And I don't think your alternative approach would work, because this statement from your suggested alternative approach is wrong: > You can change the archfulness of the main package. The main / source package needs to be "archful", because noarch source packages cannot have non-noarch subpackages. I just checked, and subpackages inherit the "BuildArch" tag from the source package. So you can override subpackages to make them noarch (archful package with noarch subpackages), but *not* the other way round. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
