Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:59 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 7/26/22 07:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 7/24/22 15:42, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > <mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson
> > >     <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> ha
> > >     scritto:
> > >
> > >         This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a
> > > non-static pcre
> > >         requirement at the time? But it seems not:
> > >
> > >         [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show 0835325:qemu.spec |
> > > grep pcre
> > >         BuildRequires: glibc-static pcre-static glib2-static zlib-static
> > >
> > >         so, I'm not sure why Daniel concluded this needs a
> > > BuildRequires on
> > >         pcre-static, but the obvious thing to do would be to ask him, I
> > >         guess.
> > >
> > >
> > >     I think it could have been a missing requires of glib2-static,
> > >     because glib does use PCRE and therefore has it in the linker flags
> > >     for a static build. I will check next time I am at a computer.
> > >
> > >
> > > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu
> > > needs to be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires
> > > pcre2-static instead?
> >
> > Yep, that works.  I still think that pcre2-static and
> > sysprof-capture-devel belong in glib2's spec file though, but I
> > committed that as a stopgap measure.
>
> Ah, yes, of course! I went ahead and added them in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/5653dff1816e4bee3c3fdbcc00f2fea73a282093?branch=rawhide
>
> Does this look right to you? Do you want me to add them in other
> branches as well or is rawhide sufficient for now?

Although listed in glib-2.0.pc, I didn't find any need for the
sysprof-capture-static package, but it does need glibc-static

Do you want to do a PR to fix it up?

-- 
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux