Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a):
> I'm still going to create a COPR build for every dependent package with
> change from "pcre" to "pcre2" requirement, so I can report each of the
> components, if it's able to just simply change to pcre2 or need to port.

If you find a package which builds after replacing BuildRequires, you should
rather report a bug.

Each package should explicitly configure enabled and disabled features instead
of automatically enabling and disabling features based on a presence of
developmental files in a build root. These automagically enabled features are
a source of nondeterminism (sponteaous build failures and feature flips)
triggered by changes in indirectly dependenent and unrelated packages.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux