Confusion on pre-implemented Emacs 28 proposal (was: Re: F37 proposal: Emacs 28 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



He Kevin,

oh, true, after all,
dnf info --releasever=36 emacs
agrees with you. Now, I'm kind of confused about the point of the change proposal?

emacs -nw -q --batch --eval '(message system-configuration-options)' 2>&1 | grep native compilaion

also tells me that the announced native compilation is also enabled, so maybe something slipped through a little early?

Cheers,
Marcus

On 20.07.22 21:36, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 7/20/22 14:57, Marcus Müller wrote:
Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!

:( I was really looking forward to emacs-pgtk.

Forgive my relative newbie-ness here, but this proposal is to upgrade Emacs to version 28 in F37. That seems fine.

This week my F36 system got upgraded to Emacs version 28, so it's already in F36. How is that possible?

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux