Re: Non-responsive maintainer-like policy for approved packages that aren't imported?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/07/14 03:29PM, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Can anyone advise as to what the policy should be when a package is reviewed
> and approved but never imported?

I already answered Mark's question on Matrix, but for the benefit of
everyone else, there is a policy here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#stalled
-- 
Thanks,

Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux