Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:13:11 -0400



    Both bear and fmidi are now rebuilt into the side tag. I defined
      the preprocessor macro FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM as a temporary
      workaround (noting that this will not be available in fmt 10.0). I
      filed an issue upstream with fmidi:
      https://github.com/jpcima/fmidi/issues/5

    
    On 7/11/22 12:50, Ben Beasley wrote:

    
      Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi)
        failed with errors like:
      /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter<T> specialization: https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt
 1733 |       formattable,
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~


      Links to failing scratch builds in the side tag:
      
        https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89380682
        https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89380736

        
      I found that there was already a bug report open upstream for
        Bear: https://github.com/rizsotto/Bear/issues/471
      If that FTBFS rate is typical of the full set of affected
        packages, then merging the side tag without resolving the API
        incompatibilities in dependent packages will be pretty
        disruptive to Rawhide as a whole.
      Would you consider setting up a COPR to figure out how many
        packages are affected by the API changes, and filing Bugzillas
        on the affected dependent packages? It might take a while for
        affected package maintainers to become aware of the problem,
        investigate, and perhaps work with upstreams to prepare the
        necessary patches.
      Link to fmt 9.0.0 release notes: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
      – Ben

      
      On 7/11/22 12:21, Ben Beasley wrote:

      
        I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I
          maintain that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent
          from the list.
        Using the following command:
            mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --dnf-cmd -- repoquery 
          --whatrequires 'libfmt.so.8*'
        I found these additional dependent packages that were missing
          from the original list:
        
          
            bear
            cachelib
            easyeffects
            easyrpg-player
            fb303
            fbthrift
            fizz
            fmidi

            
            freeopcua
            gerbera
            giada
            gnuradio
            gr-funcube
            libsemigroups
            luxcorerender
            mcrouter
            nheko
            proxygen
            rstudio
            wangle
            watchman
            waybar

            
        I will go ahead and rebuild bear, fmidi, and giada into the
          side tag.

        
        On 7/10/22 13:43, Vitaly Zaitsev
          via devel wrote:

        
        Hello.
          

          fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9.
          It has both API and ABI changes. 

          
          Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
          

          The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 

          0ad 

          OpenImageIO 

          cantera 

          ceph 

          dolphin-emu 

          domoticz 

          folly 

          libsonata 

          mkvtoolnix 

          sdrpp 

          spdlog 

          vcpkg 

          zswap-cli 

          
          I can rebuild only spdlog, vcpkg and zswap-cli. For others, I
          will need proven-packagers assistance. 

          
          Please use the f37-build-side-54844 side tag. I will merge it
          into Rawhide later. 

          
        _______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

      
      _______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

    
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure