On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 23:15, Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common > > problem where subversion relies on java-11-openjdk and without it is going > > to cause a lot of packages to be removed. Either subversion needs to lose > > that requirement or a lot of packages are going to get removed as failure > > to build in i686. > > > > libglvnd-glx<-mesa-libGL<-libxcb<-doxygen<-git<-subversion<-java-11- > openjdk-devel > > > > This email isn't a comment about it being a good or bad thing.. it is just > > what is being presented. > > I do not see why bogus "bug" reports are filed against a bazillion packages > when subversion is the only package that needs to be fixed. In fact just one subpackage of subversion, subversion-javahl. All the packages (like git) that depend on the main subversion package are completely unaffected if the subversion-javahl subpackage goes away on i686. And even for git, only the git-svn.noarch subpackage has Requires:subversion. The git package does have BuildRequires:subversion for the tests but again, it's not the subversion-javahl subpackage, and will be completely unaffected by updates to remove subversion-javahl on i686. AFAICT nothing depends on subversion-javahl and so nothing will be affected by removing it on i686, and so no packages need to care about the change to subversion that is already in rawhide. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
