F37 proposal: Linux Firmware Minimization (late System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linux_Firmware_Minimization

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
Split linux-firmware into more subpackages, and add the ability to
automatically install firmware based on the hardware present

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Salimma|Michel Alexandre Salim]],
[[User:Dcavalca|Davide Cavalca]]
* Email: michel@xxxxxx, dcavalca@xxxxxx


== Detailed Description ==
The `linux-firmware` RPM is very large (175M src.rpm, 287M
*.noarch.rpm per 20211027-126) that bundles most of the system
firmware loaded by the kernel, regardless of whether it’s actually
needed. Some additional firmwares are already split up into individual
subpackages. This change would extend that, splitting out most firmare
into appropriate subpackages. The Change would also make the
subpackages `Supplements` the appropriate `modalias(...)` for the
hardware they support and `Provides`
`firmware(kmodname/firmwarefile.bin)`

Candidates for splitting out:
* CPU firmwares
* GPU firmwares
* Non-Intel wifi firmwares
* Bluetooth firmwares

Conversely some firmware could probably be grouped together, e.g. have
iwlwifi-firmware that pulls in iwl*-firmware (corresponding to
openSUSE's kernel-firmware-iwlwifi).

We will also introduce `linux-firmware-all` that will pull in all
subpackages; this will make it easier to manage the firmware packages
in different Fedora variants.

A DNF plugin will be written to make use of the `Supplements` metadata
to automatically install the appropriate firmware packages based on
the hardware present on the system (see openSUSE's `libzypp`:
https://github.com/openSUSE/libzypp/blob/a34d857dbe3b16d4a7e0219cd213cc5a87966538/zypp/target/modalias/Modalias.cc
and https://github.com/openSUSE/libzypp/blob/7f345ea4892fd02345e8de47c2a08ab5b174650b/doc/autoinclude/Modalias.doc)

== Feedback ==


== Benefit to Fedora ==
This would save a lot of disk space on Fedora installations, and make
it easier to test individual firmware updates by replacing a single
subpackage. It will also bring us into alignment with openSUSE (see
their [https://code.opensuse.org/package/kernel-firmware/blob/master/f/kernel-firmware.spec
kernel-firmware.spec]).

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Create test COPR with proposed changes
** Add some additional firmware subpackages
** Add the required metadata (supplements, provides)
** Write DNF plugin to make use of supplements
** Write libdnf plugin for PackageKit (and in the future, microdnf)
** refactor [https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/blob/main/f/comps-f37.xml.in#_2887-2903
comps for F37]

* Other developers:
** Validate that installation works with iwl*-firmware replaced by
iwlwifi-firmware
** Test the DNF plugin
** If it works well, preinstall the DNF plugin and stop installing
iwlwifi-firmware or any of the iwl*-firmware

* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issues #Releng issue number]
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives:


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
No compatibility impact.


== How To Test ==
* Enable the test COPR
* Verify that after upgrading, no firmware subpackages are removed
* Install the DNF plugin
* Verify that the DNF plugin works: `dnf mark remove` a firmware
package that is needed, then verify that `dnf autoremove` does not
remove it
* `dnf mark remove` all firmware packages, and verify that `dnf
autoremove` only remove the unneeded packages


== User Experience ==
More disk space available, no functional changes.

== Dependencies ==
No dependency, `linux-firmware` is not required by any package

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: If the plugin is not ready in time, the other
changes would preserve the status quo. So we can postpone shipping the
DNF plugin to F38.
* Contingency deadline:<br>Decide on whether to postpone the DNF
plugin by beta freeze
* Blocks release? No


== Documentation ==
Documentation will be added in
[https://hackmd.io/KnHbJ40pQ8eJjc1H80R10w this HackMD]

== Release Notes ==



-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux