Re: F37 Change Proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 1 2022 at 01:37:01 PM +0200, Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is *not* in the proposal and should be added is a clarification whether Fedora RPMs or Flathub flatpaks take precedence, when both exist (and a Fedora flatpak doesn't). My preference would be:

Flatpaks already take precedence over RPMs, and there are no plans to change this for the reasons I mentioned in my previous mail regarding sandboxing, which is more important than other considerations.

As mentioned previously, GNOME Software can be configured to prefer RPMs over Flatpaks, but it cannot currently be configured to allow arbitrary orderings: that would require additional design and development work. Users can always have the final say if they wish to explicitly select the installation source when installing the app.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux