On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Flathub should only be preferred when there is no Fedora Flatpak available.
I don't see it in the proposal.
I see:
"GNOME Software will prefer Fedora flatpaks over Flathub flatpaks"
What is *not* in the proposal and should be added is a clarification whether Fedora RPMs or Flathub flatpaks take precedence, when both exist (and a Fedora flatpak doesn't). My preference would be:
Fedora flatpak > Fedora RPM > Flathub
or
Fedora RPM > Fedora flatpak > Flathub
If this is the case, I believe this Change is a great benefit to Fedora.
I'd be worried if we prioritized third-party software over our own builds. Yes, the security is better with flatpak over rpm, but there are also other aspects. Like having things under our own control, or having a pretty good pre-release testing processes (updates-testing, bodhi, karma) compared to flathub.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would prefer a non-sandboxed app instead of a third-party DEB repack.
And nobody is taking that option away from you ;-)
You've made your preference known. Repeating it numerous times doesn't contribute to a pleasant discussion.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
