On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 08:54 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > It is pointless to argue here about stuff that can't be changed within > the reals of the Fedora project. To get back to specific, if you have a > itch to scratch with a specific behaviour on the GNOME desktop, it is > very unlikely to get changed here by applying a patch against the upstream > code or data. The correct behaviour as an Open Source project participant is > to debate it upstream where there is an infrastructure (usability team, tools > and mailing-list) in place to get this processed. If there was no upstream > venue, then yes here would be an alternate forum by lack of better choice > but Jeff is 100% on-spot in this case, this is a GNOME usability request, > and discussion should be process there, not here. What users could hope for is that those representatives of the Gnome development group within @redhat could be the voice of @redhat's users, so that the gnome group doesn't get more and more joe-random-opinion (of which to ignore), they can get a more aggregated user base opinion from vendor representatives. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
