Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Alex Chernyakhovsky

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 14:52, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29/06/2022 20:32, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Yes, they can. So can a lot of other people and things in Fedora.

Only proven-packagers in limited situations or people who have been
granted access by the package owner.

> This isn't other distros where a package maintainer is a defacto dictator of the package they put into the OS. There is a give and take in what can happen with a package.

But it is. The package owner has full control over the package and can
add or remove co-maintainers as they see fit.


I believe the term 'package owner' was killed several years ago in Fedora. Maintainers are custodians and do not own the package. 
 
But now we see that someone can add other people to co-maintainers. This
is terrible.





--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux