Re: Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber wrote:
> It turns out that bodhi applies the same boundary conditions to
> "newpackage" updates (no karma for your own update, 7 days minimum to
> stable by time). I don't think a new leave package can disturb current
> systems much ... A library, in particular, will not receive any testing
> while in testing.

I also question the usefulness of these restrictions for new packages (and 
have done so for years), because a new package does not upgrade any existing 
package and so cannot really break anything that worked before. But the 
rationale that was given (by the majority of FESCo and by QA) when this was 
discussed years ago was that new packages can have broken Obsoletes, 
Provides, and/or Supplements (or Enhances, but that is mostly ignored by the 
current package dependency solvers) that can break existing systems merely 
by having the package in the repository.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux