V Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:50:31PM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Official non-scratch builds for non-merged pull requests? Looks very > > > dangerous. > > > > Yeah. I think we should think about scratch and non-scratch builds > > separately. For scratch builds, e.g. in a pull request, it's just fine > > to do repeated builds with the same NEVR. For non-scratch builds, the > > fact that you cannot do that is a feature. > > The advantage I see in the proposal is that the final build gets promoted, > so you have an artifact which has, theoretically at least, been under > scrutiny, rather than a new one which we _hope_ is the same. > > But I'm not sure that really buys us a lot in quality, since the build > environment updates. If promoting the scratch build avoids a problem that > would have happened if it were rebuilt... well, that problem is going to > come up later during a mass or automatic rebuild later anyway. > The same applies to nonscratch builds. We do not rebuild packages when moving them from updates-testing to updates repository only to make sure they still build or fit to the environment. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
