Re: Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 01:36:22PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> can probably just treat as a proxy for RHEL performance.) Clear and
> RHEL (rebuilds) probably get most of their advantages from building
> for an x86_64-v2 microarchitecture, which Fedora discussed and
> rejected last year (after discussing and rejecting a proposal to
> build for x86_64-v3 two years before that.)  If you exclude Clear


Phoronix credits this to those distros shipping with P-state Performance by
default. In order to figure out what's really the best there as a default
for users (rather than benchmarks), I think we'd need to do some significant
testing with real-world workloads for latency, throughput, and power
consumption. (It might be something where we'd want a different default for
Fedora Workstation than for Server or IoT...)

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux