On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 07:13:55PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer > > [...] > > === Unwinding === > > [...] > > * Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10% > > regressions in some benchmarks > > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20170602104048.jkkzssljsompjdwy@xxxxxxx/T/#u) > > Regressions of such magnitude can veto such changes, especially when > they hit everyone, not just those who are highly dependent on the > profiling tools the proposal is concerned about. I can only concur. Say what you want about Phoronix benchmark, but they consistently benchmark different distributions And Fedora consistently is lagging behind. Latest article is at https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=h1-2022-linux Slowing Fedora even further is really undesirable. -- Tomasz Torcz “Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx in the afternoon and evening.” - Alan Cox _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
