Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> They all blocked the F34FailsToInstall tracker, if that helps.

It helps for F34, but updating the tracking bug for each release
doesn't play well with my Jupyter notebook. But! Now that I've had
more coffee I realize that I can just look for the "FailsToInstall"
and "FTBFS" string in the bug summary. It's not perfect (someone might
edit the summary to remove that string or another bug might include it
but not actually be what we're looking for), but the cases where we
get a false positive/negative should be small enough to not matter.

As an added bonus, I already have the historical data to do this for
past releases. So I think I'll include this in my updated "Exploring
our bugs" talk at Nest.

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux