Re: What to do with packages that fail to install since Fedora 34 but BZs are ASSIGNED?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 7:33 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I wonder how many of them will be set to ASSIGNED without any action, how many
> will get fixed, and how many will actually pass unnoticed this time, allowing
> the packages to be orphaned and hopefully taken by somebody who will fix them.

Historical data will be hard, but if future FTI (and FTBFS, in case we
want that later) bugs are tagged with a specific string in the
Whiteboard, it would be easy to add a query for FTI bugs closed EOL.
That could be a very interesting stat for us to track over time.

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux