On 5/21/22 13:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:28 AM Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/20/22 14:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
> Make the normal rpms to not built jdk, but to repack the portable rpms with all integration
thanx.
Or are you already in the follwoing year, when the attempt will be doen to build each JDK in koji just once, and ship it to al llive fedoras?
Repackaging of anything even it was built in Koji is strictly prohibited. All packages must be built from sources. No exceptions.
shim?
Shim is technically built on Fedora infrastructure as shim-unsigned.
Microsoft signs that binary and the shim package has those binaries as
sources in that package.
OpenJDK is not that strict, and frankly I don't think we'd want to do
more than just that package that way. It's a massive pain and it's
pretty evident that this arrangement causes us serious problems too,
since it locks the Fedora community out of fixing issues at that
level.
Hm. For "silent observer" (in case of shmi and codecs) the burden seemed not so high, But as Kevinlater described, it was a bit underestimated.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
