So, just replying here since this is a nice monster of a thread. ;( First, just to clear up some previous coments, shim does build against the oldest stable Fedora in koji and then is manually tagged into newer ones. This is not at all a good process. It only gets a bodhi update for the one release (and sometimes not even that), so it never gets good testing. It requires manual intervention from releng each time there's an update. I think the only reason this has kept going is that shim is very small and simple and updates rarely. If we need to do this for tons of openjdk updates, we really should revisit the process, although I am not sure how to make it more open to testing and less a burden on releng. ;( Next, My understanding of the current process for openjdks (openjdki?): for each openjdk: Build dyanmically linking against system libraries in all fedoras. Submit to TCK and wait for them all to process. Fix any TCK failures and repeat Once there's no failures, push the builds to updates Is that right? And keeping the dynamic builds passing is taking more cycles than you have to give for the number of jdks? What about the possibility of adding CI _upstream_ to test against the dynamic version? Then TCK failures would be caught upstream and not downstream where it's a lot of work for you to fix? Could we integrate the TCK testing in our CI to save you overhead of managing submitting, etc? Or where is the most time spent in this workflow? I know others have suggested fewer openjdk streams to reduce workload, but I didn't see any reply on that from change owners. Thanks, kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure