Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:08 PM Otto Urpelainen <oturpe@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Neal's proposal seems simple and safe.

Except that it conflicts with another of the
proposal authors, who claims one will be
required to use %if-%else logic.

Limitations in tooling to not report violations
of the intention of the requirements IRT
licensing formats really seem besides the
point (although it might very well influence
the final approach).

I would ask that the proposal authors
converge on whether SPDX licenses
will be allowed for all supported branches.
Only then can one have a clear idea
as to package(r) impacts and (perhaps)
how to move forward.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux