On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:02 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17. 05. 22 16:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 17. 05. 22 v 16:18 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > >> So, is it actually allowed to use SPDX identifiers when this phase is > >> activated, or not? > > > > SPDX identifiers will be allowed when all these conditions will be met: > > > > * Change approved by FESCO > > > > * after F38 branching > > > > * documentation with conversion chart will be ready > > > > This is posted a lot of time ahead, so people can prepare in advance. > > Thanks for the explanation. Could this be explicitly written in the change > proposal? Also, when you say "after F38 branching", does that mean it will not > be allowed in f35, f36 and f37 branches? Do we need to %if-%else it in the spec > file? I recall some discussion about this on the legal list, but I see no > guidelines proposed here. > It is not technically possible for us to separate the Bodhi update checks in this manner, so the goal will be to add approved SPDX identifiers to the list, rather than removing Fedora identifiers. That means once the tooling changes are in place, SPDX identifiers will be permitted across all update code streams supported by the Fedora Project. >From my perspective, we will be many years (as in we're likely talking RHEL 11 or RHEL 12 timeframe) before even *deprecating* Fedora identifiers. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
