On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:33 PM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:50 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Could we consider, in future, posting a clarification for journalists > > in flaming six-foot high letters (I exaggerate only slightly) at the > > top of *every* proposed Change page, and *every* official mail relating > > to a proposed Change, which clarifies that it's *proposed* not > > *accepted*, and that means it might not happen? I feel like we'd have > > to firefight less if we could do that. > > Sadly, some of this is due to the "media" organization's > need to drive page views and not journalistic ignorance > of the facts that this is just a proposal. > > I don't know how you fix the underlying revenue enhancement > approaches that have driven hyperbole and attempts to drive > engagement and outrage. And if you do, please share! > > (My cynical answer is to create a "payall" to see the > details of the proposals, with (fedora) signup and providing > detailed demographic data to complete the login (turnabout > is fair play?)). Do nothing and let them embarrass themselves freely? Their target audience is usually smart enough to see through that real quick. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
