On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:50 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Could we consider, in future, posting a clarification for journalists > in flaming six-foot high letters (I exaggerate only slightly) at the > top of *every* proposed Change page, and *every* official mail relating > to a proposed Change, which clarifies that it's *proposed* not > *accepted*, and that means it might not happen? I feel like we'd have > to firefight less if we could do that. Sadly, some of this is due to the "media" organization's need to drive page views and not journalistic ignorance of the facts that this is just a proposal. I don't know how you fix the underlying revenue enhancement approaches that have driven hyperbole and attempts to drive engagement and outrage. And if you do, please share! (My cynical answer is to create a "payall" to see the details of the proposals, with (fedora) signup and providing detailed demographic data to complete the login (turnabout is fair play?)). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
