* Richard W. M. Jones: > This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files > > is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're > trying to build live CDs on F35. I'd like to therefore backport it to > dnf in Fedora 35+. > > However dnf is obviously a very important, core package, so I also > don't want to risk breaking things. I believe the risk of breaking > things is minimal. It might imperceptibly slow things down, worst > case. > > What do you think? Isn't this a bit of a gross hack? I mean, if the DnfSack object needs to be closed, should this be done explicitly? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
