Re: Backporting upstream gc.collect to dnf Fedora 35+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:35 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
>
> is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
> trying to build live CDs on F35.  I'd like to therefore backport it to
> dnf in Fedora 35+.
>
> However dnf is obviously a very important, core package, so I also
> don't want to risk breaking things.  I believe the risk of breaking
> things is minimal.  It might imperceptibly slow things down, worst
> case.
>
> What do you think?
>

It seems reasonable to me.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux