On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 10:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:06 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Right now it's not entirely clear whether this is considered part of > > > the Change scope or not. The paragraph about the `uvesafb` driver seems > > > kind of aspirational and doesn't seem to commit to anything. The > > > "Benefit to Fedora" section states "Verified modern supported paths for > > > cases currently handled by vesa/fbdev", but I'm not 100% clear what is > > > meant by that. > > > > IMHO, it is not acceptable to remove the vesa driver without having > > something like uvesafb to replace it. > > I like how I'm being told _not_ to find out where the remaining bugs > are in our native drivers, and instead preserve something awful for > eternity. Well, come on, you're not being "told" anything. Neither me nor Kevin is your boss. This is a Change proposal, it's sent to this list for people to discuss it and provide feedback on it. That's what we're doing.
