Re: verifying signature for a package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Beasley wrote:
> It doesn’t really matter what the file is called. Personally, I would rename it to oclock.gpg and add a brief spec file comment explaining where it came from.

I agree. It's important to document where the key came from, and the
filename by itself would just be confusing.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpN5Yn8MxPsW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux