Re: verifying signature for a package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 









On Sunday, April 17, 2022, 05:26:52 AM CDT, Maxwell G via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 






> Apr 16, 2022 8:01:27 PM Globe Trotter via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>> Source1:    %{source0}.sig
> Does this still fail if you use the full path? It looks like `%{source0}` isn't getting expanded properly.


Yes, indeed, `%{source0}` isn't getting expanded properly.

However putting the full path stll gives the error:

gpgverify: No keyring was provided.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.d9rVUX (%prep)


I am looking into the example.

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux