Re: Revisiting ROCm packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Nice work!

Thanks :)

> The only x86 32-bit use I can think of would be wine if it supports ROCm.

Yeah I looked into it, and it looks like rocm-runtime fails on 32bit due to some assumptions for 64bit in the code.
I don't think there's too much value to 32bit, so it's not really worth trying to rework the code.
 
> The answer in Fedora is usually: work with upstream to unbundle. If
> ROCclr is used by more than one package then there's value in unbundling
> it and making it a shared library. Same for the others.

Yeah, upstream seems a bit uninterested. Last time I checked, you could build ROCclr independently as a static lib, but it's deprecated. I might try that when I have time, and then see how easy it is to convert to a shared lib.

Thanks for the feedback
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux