Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 07/04/2022 18:10, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> While we do maintain a large set of patches downstream, due to upstream >> being inactive for a while, today upstream is alive and very much not >> abandoned: > > Why not upstream all those patches then? I resent the implication that I'm not doing that. The idea that one would show up with a decent-sized pile of patches and have an upstream merge them immediately sits somewhere between "naïve" and "a reason to vote no-confidence in upstream". Be well, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
