Re: Is there a bug in UFS system (ufstype=sunx86)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 05 July 2005 15:11, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
>  Excuses, I just wrote that wrong:
>
>  /dev/hdd1    /Solaris          ufs          ufstype=sunx86,ro      0  0
>
>  That's what I get:
>
>  [root@200-185-243-180 casimiro]# !mount
>  mount -vat ufs
>  mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd1,
>         missing codepage or other error
>         In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>         dmesg | tail  or so
>
>  And then, with dmesg | tail:
>
>  [root@200-185-243-180 casimiro]# dmesg | tail
>  parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
>  lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven).
>  lp0: console ready
>  application mozilla-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  application firefox-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  application mplayer uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  application mozilla-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  application skype uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  application firefox-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
>  ufs_read_super: bad magic number
>
>  So, it seems that something is wrong with ufs driver.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Casimiro
Sorry if I missed it before but could you post the partition informiation 
listed by Linux at bootup? You have sun disklabel support compiled into the 
kernel, right?

Peter.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux