On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:58 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Christopher napsal(a): > > Even if PDC is the most valuable thing to Fedora composes ever, casual > > contributors who only work on packaging should never have to care > > about it. > > > You should reavaluate importance of composes. Without a compose no package > reaches a user. > > > What is PDC's relevance to packagers? > > Module EOLs. Without PDC you cannot terminate a support for a module stream. > It's like you weren't able to retire an RPM package. So you're saying that the *only* thing we really need the PDC for is to allow modules to be retired, and that's why you don't want it to go away? Given that it's basically unmaintained, and causes problems on a regular basis, that reason looks very weak to me. Couldn't those module EOL dates be handled much simpler? I mean, even a static text file would be a better solution for that than what we have now. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
